Stepup Software for Teachers - GOs and Guidelines

AP Teachers Stepup software as per PRC 2015 , TS Teachers Stepup software , Andhra Pradesh Employees Step up Increment Salary Bill ,  Stepup Check list , Telangana Employees Step up Increment Salary Bill , Step up Guidelines , Stepup GOs 

Teachers Step up Software and Check list 

Employees StepUp Software Increment Preparation Bill 

Steup Conditions as per G.O. Ms. No. 93 Finance ( PC- II) Department , Dated:03-04-2010

 (i) both the Senior and Junior should have been drawing pay in an identical scale

 (ii) both the Senior and Junior should be in service as on 01-07-2008 and junior should have been promoted on or after 01-07-2008. In other words the anomaly should have arisen on or after 1-7-2008

(iii) the senior as well as the junior should be promoted to the same category of post carrying the same scale of pay under the same mode of recruitment and from the same unit of appointment in the lower category.

iv) the pay of the junior in the lower category should have been less than or equal to that of the senior in the lower category prior to promotion of the senior to the higher post.

(v) the anomaly should be directly as a result in the case of Junior, who is promoted to a higher post after getting the benefit of Automatic Advancement Scheme and got more pay than his senior in the same category, who got promotion to the higher post without getting the benefit of Automatic Advancement Scheme

(vi) the pay of the senior should have been fixed under F.R. 22(a)(i) read with F.R. 31(2) on promotion from Automatic Advancement Scales in the feeder category, whereas the pay of the Junior should have been fixed under F.R. 22-B on promotion from the Automatic Advancement Scales in the feeder category

(vii) the stepping up pay is not admissible in cases where the junior is drawing higher pay for any other reason such as sanction of Advance Increment for possession of higher qualification or Family Planning Incentive Increment or reckoning D.A. thereon for fixation of pay in earlier pay revisions, Advance Increments for merit, or on account of longer service in the lower post for working in various units of appointments etc

(viii) in all cases affected by this order, the pay of the senior shall be fixed notionally from the date the junior got higher pay than that of the senior in the higher post, with monetary benefit from 01-02-2010, if such anomaly arose in between 01-07-2008 to 31-01-2010. In cases where such anomaly arose after 01-02-2010, the benefit shall be allowed from the date the pay of the Junior was more than that of Senior 

Model Check List
S.No.	DETAILS OF EMPLOYEE				SENIOR			JUNIOR
1	Name of the Employee				Sri. S.Kumar			Sri. B.Anji Babu
2	Feeder Post Designation				S.G.T.			S.G.T.
3	Promotion Post Designation				S.A.(B.S.)			S.A.(B.S.)
4	Date of Appointment to the Feeder Post				12/11/2000			12/11/2000
5	D.Sc. of Appointment of the Feeder Post/ Roster No.				D.Sc. 2000 / 458			D.Sc. 2000 / 596
6	Special Grade( SG)  6 years				12/11/2007			12/11/2007
7	SPP - IA 12 years				23/08/2012			12/11/2012
8	SPP -IB 18years				---------			12/07/2014
9	Pay in the lower cadre as on date of promotion of senior				20050			20050
10	Date of Promotion				17/08/2012			20/11/2013
11	Pay fixed on Promotion ( FR 22 a)				20640			20050
12	Pay fixed on Promotion ( FR 22 b)				……………….			22460
13	Scale of Pay  in feeder post on date of  promotion				21230-63010			28940-78910
14	Scale of Pay ( Present )				22460-66330			29760-80930
15	Date of Increment				Nov-13			Nov-13
16	Present Basic Pay				21820			22460
17	Pay fixed  on Stepping up of Pay  w.e.f. 01/11/2013				22460
CONDITIONS							FULLFILLED OR NOT
1	Both the senoir and junior should have been drawing pay in an identical pay scale in the existing scales of pay						YES
2	The senior as well as the junior should be promoted to the same category of post carrying the same scale of pay under the same mode of recruitment and from the same unit of appointment in the lower category						YES
3	the pay of the junior in the lower category should have been less than or equal to that of the senior in the lower category prior to promotion of the senior to the higher post						YES
4	the anomoly should have arisen directly as a result of the fixation of pay in the existing scales under AAS						YES

 Signature of the  Mandal Education Officer

* Step up Software Download   
* Step up GOs Download